Setareh Homayoni
30th April 2026
A new bill introduced in Congress could hand the fossil fuel industry something it has wanted for years: broad legal protection from lawsuits seeking to hold oil and gas companies accountable for climate damages. Rep. Harriet Hageman and Sen. Ted Cruz introduced the ‘Stop Climate Shakedowns’ bill on April 17, and it is designed to give fossil fuel companies sweeping immunity from legal and financial accountability for the harms caused by climate change.
That matters because climate accountability lawsuits are no longer a novel theory. More than 30 significant cases are now moving through American courts, brought by states and local governments, arguing that fossil fuel companies knew for decades that their products would drive dangerous climate change, then deceived the public and blocked action to protect their profits.
Why the fossil fuel industry wants immunity now
Courts have repeatedly refused fossil fuel companies' attempts to have these cases thrown out, and some are moving closer to the point where internal company documents can be scrutinized and executives questioned under oath.
At the same time, attribution science has advanced significantly, making it easier to link specific climate harms to specific emissions. For the first time, real accountability is coming into view.
That helps explain why the industry and its political allies are pushing so hard for an immunity shield now. If these companies can be protected by legislation, they may not have to fight these cases on the merits in court at all.
Critics say the push resembles the gun industry’s 2005 federal liability shield, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act — a model fossil fuel allies appear eager to replicate. The American Petroleum Institute, the industry's largest trade association, has named stopping climate liability cases as one of its top priorities for 2026.
From the states to Congress: a coordinated campaign for a liability shield
This push did not begin in Washington. It started in statehouses. Similar bills have already passed in Utah and Tennessee, and related proposals have been introduced in states including Iowa, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. Investigative reporting by ProPublica has traced many of these bills to a shared network of conservative advocacy groups drafting model legislation and lobbying for its passage. But Congress was always the bigger prize.
That is because federal law can reach far beyond any one state. A federal fossil fuel immunity bill could threaten climate damages cases across the country, undermining current litigation and making future cases much harder to bring. That is why this fight is about more than one bill, or one round of lawsuits. It is about whether one of the world's most powerful industries gets to place itself above the law.
But if that happens, the damage does not disappear.
Who pays for climate damage if fossil fuel companies are shielded from lawsuits
Communities will still face floods, fires, heat, storm damage, rising insurance costs, and expensive rebuilding bills. Roads will still buckle. Public infrastructure will still need repair. Families and local governments will still have to pay to recover from disasters made worse by fossil fuel pollution. The only question is who pays: the corporations whose products helped fuel the crisis, or the public instead.
Efforts like climate accountability lawsuits and climate superfund laws — state-level measures that would require major polluters to help pay for climate damage recovery — are about that question.
That is what makes the new immunity bill so dangerous. It is not just an obscure legal maneuver. It is an attempt to slam the courthouse door just as these cases are beginning to advance — and to make sure the costs of climate damage stay with everyone except the corporations that helped cause it and profited from it.
Stay informed. Get involved. Sign up for our newsletter to follow the legal fights for climate accountability and the ways you can be part of them.